Principia Primordia – Meditations on the Structure of the Universe – Cosmic Phenomena Part 3: Dark Energy, Matter-Antimatter Dominance, and The Arrow of Time.

The big questions. Why can’t we see out of our Universe; why is there a boundary, and are there other Universes within a larger Multiverse? Why is the Universal expansion accelerating? Why is there more Matter than Antimatter? Why does time appear to flow one way?

I will offer a conceptual framework that explains these phenomena, hopefully in an intuitive way.

We’ve previously established some ‘Primordial Principles’ which we will apply and infer potential explanations for other phenomena, namely:

Symmetry/Polarity

Circular Repetition/Strange Loops

Fractals/Tree-like Structures

We will be focusing mainly on the circular geometry and some symmetry for the purpose of the aforementioned phenomena. The other assumption: Our Universe is a Black Hole.

This ‘circular repetition’ extends all the way from our observed magnitude: ‘The music of the spheres’ of the heavenly bodies (Sun, Earth, Moon), down to atoms and the spinning light in the Kaluza-Klein CTC quantum particle framework we have previously outlined. A Black Hole would be the equivalent when applied to the cosmic or Universal scale- namely a Kerr Black Hole (spinning photon cloud).

In our previous framework on a quantum scale, we suggested that mass is the result of light changing direction or accelerating. As we know, Black Holes have a very large gravitational force, so much so that light cannot escape. I suggest that this is due to a vast quantity of spinning light.

I will make some statements, and then go to lengths to explain them as best I can:

The passage of time is the evolution of energy and information travelling inwards towards the center of the Black Hole, and in the direction of its spin. Similar to our quantum example, this looks like a whirlpool of photons into a gravitational well of increasing space density.

When we look far enough ‘outwards’ into the cosmos, we are looking back in time, as it takes time for information to travel to us at the current moment of our observer frame. If we look far enough back in time, we see the Plasma source of the CMBR (Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation). We can’t see further than this plasma, as photons are scattered in the plasma such that they cannot carry information through it (from ‘behind’, in, or before it). Contemporary physics infers from the expansion from this point forwards, that the universe was smaller before this boundary. I would suggest that this boundary (or some state before it) is in fact the periphery of the Neutron Star that collapsed into the black hole that formed our universe- something that also consists of a very dense and highly ionised plasma; the event horizon or ‘ring of fire’ of our black hole universe is one and the same as the CMBR plasma. The reason we cannot observe outside of our universe is a constraint of light being unable to escape the gravitational well of the black hole, and that information passing through the boundary is marred such that it cannot carry any meaningful information. There are some caveats in string theory that suggest that black holes can have ‘hair’ on it’s surface, and Hawkings suggests that energy can evaporate from a black hole also- meaning that some quantities of energy and information may be able to escape.

The above is an interpretive artwork of the universe, with our observer frame at the center, going backwards in time as we move ‘outwards’ until the Primordial Plasma at the ‘beginning of time’.

As we’ve said previously, light can be considered a sort of limit to the frame rate of the universe- nothing can go faster. The relationship between light and time is a close one; ‘Where light goes, time flows’. In terms of our experience of time within the universe, within this framework, the direction of light (and time with it), is implied by the gravitational force. For those familiar with light cones:

This shows the possible direction of light as it approaches the event horizon of the black hole- once past it, it MUST travel inwards, implying that time must flow in the direction of the center. That is to say, then, that light travelling in any of the 3 spatial dimensions we experience are travelling in the same direction in an extra dimension within this black hole model of the universe.

This is why we can’t (conventionally/classically, on a larger scale) see information from the future, as that would require light moving in a direction outwards from the center of the black hole- which isn’t possible.

As well as light travelling only inwards, in a Kerr black hole it also (mostly) all spins in the same direction. This is the mechanism responsible for the Matter-Antimatter dominance.

What is Antimatter? It’s a symmetry in Matter- each particle has a corresponding antiparticle which is the equivalent antithesis to its corresponding particle. Imagine a chiral opposite like your reflection in the mirror- when matter looks in the mirror it sees antimatter. It generally has the same mass, but equal and opposite ‘quantum numbers’ such as charge, strangeness, baryon number, lepton number, etc… Most interestingly though, antiparticles are mathematically equivalent to particles moving backwards through time!

I remember asking one of my professors: “If they are in fact particles moving backwards in time, then could the matter-antimatter dominance be resolved if you look at time as going both ways?”. The answer is yes, if you were to look at time bidirectionally, then it is simply a matter of perspective as to whether you define something as a particle or an antiparticle- but we don’t experience time bidirectionally, and there are a few other caveat issues with this to do with Time-Parity violations and Bell Inequalities.

I believe then, that antimatter is matter spinning in an opposite direction in its CTC rotation to that of all of it’s matter equivalent, relative to the overall spin of the universal black hole frame. The overall spin informs the spin of all internal matter (or micro flows and eddies of light) in a similar way to the magma in the center of the earth- it’s a ‘Cosmic-Quantum Coriolis effect’. Let me explain: Due to the rotation of the earth, micro-currents of liquid magma in the earth’s core are caused to spin in the same direction.

The rotation of the currents within (blue ribbons) are informed by the rotation of the whole frame, and the same is the case for our black hole and the matter within it. Another occurrence of the emergence of fractal scaling patterns of behaviour in rotational dynamics.

The reason, then, for the Matter-Antimatter dominance is due to the overall rotation of the frame, causing all inner spins to be aligned/oriented with the angular momentum of the total frame. Antimatter is rare because it requires light to rotate in opposition to the majority (backwards in time relative to everything else); the process of annihilation (where matter and antimatter ‘cancel out’) is the clash of two CTC vortices of opposing spin.

So, Dark Energy..? I will first explain it in a more complicated way, and then a simple way.

I visualise it as the increase in the density of time as we approach nearer the center of the black hole; we will assume a spherical/circular black hole for the purpose of this example. (Excuse the crude drawing)

The concentric circles here represent the condensing of time in this extra dimension as we move forward in time, to the limit of an infinite density of time in the center. We see this in relativity- time moves faster for a moving frame, or close to bodies of mass; as the mass density increases closer to the center, time flows faster- giving the appearance of space expanding for the light travelling through it (given that we must measure time in reference to the speed of light). If we take a slice:

The horizontal black lines represent space, with it condensing as we approach the center. The yellow lines represent photons or the speed of light, which is constant. As we move forward in time towards the right, it appears as if the distance that the light move increases relative to the grid-lines of spacetime. For photon 1 vs 6 for instance, closer to the beginning of time at the periphery of the black hole, light travels much less distance (at the same speed) than it does further into the black hole further in time, giving the impression that space is expanding.

I will admit fully now, that I need to iron out whether it is space, time, or both that condense as we move forward, but this is an example of the basic concept that condensing of (space/time/both) in one frame can give the impression of expansion of space in another.

For the more intuitive explanation:

The expansion is essentially the process of spaghettification, which states that as a person or object approaches the surface/event horizon of a black hole, due to the difference in the gravitational pull and the very fabric of spacetime even on small scales such as the length of a body- the persons feet would be pulled in faster than their head- essentially stretching them out. But why only think of this in terms of matter and objects, and why only upon entry up to the event horizon boundary? I am suggesting here that this process applies to spacetime itself, and continues past the event horizon, such that as time moves forward and inwards with the light, space is stretched, which is the universal expansion that we observe.

Above, an image of an astronaut approaching the event horizon of a black hole, becoming elongated as they get closer to the boundary.

So, to summarise: In the theoretical framework that I suggest- the direction of time is informed by gravity, antimatter is CTC light-particles spinning in the opposite direction to the overarching direction of the spin of the universal frame, and dark matter is a caveat of the condensing of space-time as we move forward in it, giving the appearance of space expanding from our perspective.

Now, finally- to come full circle (if you’ll pardon the pun): One of the constraints for the emergence of CTCs in the Godel metric or ‘Godel Universe’, is that the universe must be spinning. So the theory of a spinning universal frame of a black hole also provides the means for the mechanism that we used to explain quantum phenomena in a previous article.

A few other caveats and points of elaboration in the future:

The perceived weakness of gravity compared to the other forces of nature such as electromagnetism and nuclear forces, could be due to the gravitational force exerted externally from the universe into a higher-order ‘verse’. Not all gravity is applied internally, and so it ‘bleeds’ outwards. This is in line with some thoughts of Kaluza-Klein theory which suggests that the weakness of gravity could be due to it being exerted in other dimensions or ‘modes’.

The suggestion that our universe is just another bubble in the scaling fractal ‘music of the spheres’; that it is a ‘verse’ within a larger ‘verse’ or bubble universe within larger bubbles- much like black holes, stars, planets, moons, atoms, particles, etc could be seen as bubbles within our universe – a cosmic fractal foam of sorts.

Hypothetically, as new energy is introduced to our black hole universe, how does this affect the balance of forces and causality in general- is retro-causality permissible, could it be that the history of our universe is being constantly rewritten and edited, from the beginning of time?

Find a better way for describing the grid-lines of spacetime condensing and how to think about it – maybe that time is slower at the beginning of our universe, giving us the impression that things are moving apart faster now.

Elaboration on structure of black hole- not completely spherical, and it may be that it takes the same form as our ‘twistor’, with poles at either end of a central axis instead of a literal infinite density singularity at the center- it’s a limit defined by the rate of change of the direction of light, which at the center becomes more like a cylinder or tube in which light may be forced to reorient vertically ‘outwards’ and escape. What does the end of time look like? Is it cyclical, or does some information escape?

Study of the time parity violation of K-Muons in terms of exploring the orientation of angular momentum, how it might be arranged with respect to/relative to the spin of the black hole.

Larger scale cosmic CTCs within the black hole..? Are we on a surface that remains at a constant distance in the black hole with information passing inwards and ‘through’ our moment-brane; are we moving directly inwards or spiralling? Is there an outward ‘centrifugal’ pressure? This could be the aforementioned cylinder. SNF would work similarly by pulling in for external objects, and pushing out for those within.

Dark Matter also being due to rate of change of direction of light in the spin of the universe- light either further apart, or further in time (closer to center) would change direction more drastically relative to other frames- if dark matter is due to acceleration (change in direction) of light, then it would also appear to increase in magnitude as we move forward in time due to the spin of the frame.

Quantum fluctuations at the beginning of time due to differences in energy density of neutron star that collapsed – not uniform.

All the way up and around, full circle – A ‘strange loop’ that increases in scale and returns as the smallest object; our universe or higher-order ‘verse’ is in fact the electron. (poetic, pushing to even be considered conjectural- but I think likely due to primordial principles). A ‘strange loop fractal’ paradox.

t parity violation in weak decay due to orientation respect to spinning frame.

What do our ER-EPR wormholes look like in this frame as they connect points at different temporal locations in the black hole model?